Evolution of Global Opt-In Litigation

In non-U.S. opt-in matters, book builds can extend over long time periods – sometimes years – particularly where there are several competing organizers, large numbers of eligible institutional investors with significant losses, and repose dates (the outside legal time limit for filing claims) far in the future.

Group complaints get filed when case organizers (lawyers and funders) reach critical mass, i.e. when total losses for claimants under the contract exceed their pre-set thresholds for investment vitality. In other words, when they are ‘locked-in’ by contract, the share of potential future recoveries is sufficient to justify a multi-million dollar investment in the costs of cases and the assumption of adverse cost award risk (having to pay the other sides’ legal fees and costs if the case fails).

Whether subsequent group complaints get filed depends on whether more viable groups can be put together. When high profile scandals occur at companies with large numbers of institutional investors, there’s often enough eligibility and interest for multiple organizers to file groups complaints, and sometimes for some of them to file for more than one group. When repose dates approach if they perceive enough interested investors still on the sidelines, case organizers typically push for final registrations and group filings.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR INVESTORS?

Two cases that organizers believe have approaching repose dates in September and October 2020 illustrates the above dynamics. They are pushing for final registration this month and for both, this will be investors’ last opportunity to participate if they would like to move forward.

1. Danske Bank A/S (click here to read the case spotlight): In 2018, seven separate case organizers solicited institutions to join their recovery efforts. Two later dropped out. Since March 2019, the rest have filed multiple group complaints for hundreds of institutional investors. One is putting together the fourth round. Believing defendants will argue the repose period expires next month and three are making further, final pushes for registrations (click here to read the case update). This is a typical ‘clean-up’ effort and if you want to potentially recover, you will need to register with one of the three organizers now.

2. Tesco PLC (click here to read the case spotlight): In 2016, after book building by several case organizers, two group complaints were filed. The other efforts failed to launch, likely related to the high risks of litigating in the UK and its chilling effect on eligible investors. Those cases are set for trial in October 2020. Organizers expect the defendants to argue the repose period expires in September and/or October 2020, before the trials. Therefore, investors who have not previously joined efforts cannot wait for the results of the trials before deciding whether to pursue their own claims. Instead, they must take steps now to preserve claims before they legally expire.

If the plaintiffs prevail at trial or settle, the hope is this will bolster the claimants’ prospects for recovery as Tesco will presumably want to resolve things rather than face new rounds of litigation. If the plaintiffs fail to recover, this will re-enforce a decision not to take further action. Unlike Danske, this final push is more than a typical ‘clean-up’ effort. It involves preserving optionality while events unfold that should impact the prospects for recovery.

NEXT STEPS

FRT has prepared detailed materials outlining your remaining options and the registration requirements for both matters. We can assist you in registering for them. Now is the time to act as we do not expect future opportunities.

Please contact your FRT Representative or email us to arrange a call with the FRT team.

Subscribe to FRT’s Monthly Newsletter

Financial Recovery Technologies’ Shareholder Litigation Fast Five provides you with the top news in shareholder class actions. This is your exclusive summary of the latest industry developments related to settled, group and antitrust actions and recovery opportunities. Click here to subscribe.

Learn More

To learn more about how FRT can help your firm maximize recoveries in shareholder class action settlements, contact us at learnmore@frtservices.com.

About FRT

SETTLED CLAIMS  I  PASSIVE GROUP  I  ANTITRUST  I  FUTURE CLAIMS  I  OPT-IN MONITORING  I OPT-OUT MONITORING

Founded in 2008, Financial Recovery Technologies (FRT) is the leading technology-based services firm that helps the investment community identify eligibility, file claims and collect funds made available in securities and other class action settlements. Offering the most comprehensive range of claim filing and monitoring services available, we provide best-in-class eligibility analysis, disbursement auditing and client reporting, and deliver the highest level of accuracy, accountability, and transparency available. For more information, go to www.frtservices.com.

This communication and the content found by following any link herein are being provided to you by Financial Recovery Technologies (FRT) for informational purposes only and do not constitute advice. All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but FRT makes no representation or warranty with respect to this communication or such content and expressly disclaims any implied warranty under law. Opinions expressed in this communication may change without prior notice. Firms should always seek legal and financial advice specific to their unique situation and objectives.