Webinar Replay: Lessons Learned from Recent Shareholder Litigation Cases Outside the United States

In a recent webinar, FRT’s securities litigation counsel, Mike Lange, discussed the changing global landscape for investment recovery actions, with a particular focus on Europe. He described the risk categories of actions in different countries and shared thoughts on how the landscape for investment recovery in Europe is likely to evolve. Highlights include:

  • Globally, there is a significant rise in the number of companies being sued for investment recovery. There are more matters, more organizers and funders entering the market, and more competition for investor registrations.
  • Outside of North America, filings in Australia and Taiwan dominate. Excluding the U.S. and Canada, over the past three and a half years more than 70% of global filings have come from Australia and Taiwan. The process in Australia is similar to the U.S.; Taiwan uses class actions but has limited participation by institutions and limited eligibility among FRT clients.
  • The trends in Europe are similar but the pace is slower. As elsewhere, in Europe, there are more companies getting sued, more funders entering the market, and increased competition for investor registrations. In particular, Germany and the Netherlands are seeing increased filings, as is the UK.
  • In deciding whether to participate in filings, investors should understand the risks of different jurisdictions. Europe remains a patchwork of countries with different laws, rules, and ways of dealing with cases. To decide whether to participate in actions, investors must understand the risks associated with different jurisdictions.

Jurisdictions can be classified as passive or active.

  • Passive. A passive jurisdiction has no risk of adverse party cost shifting (loser pays), no disclosure of who passive participants are, and participants are not required to provide any information during discovery. Australia is a passive jurisdiction.
  • Active. Active jurisdictions have different levels of risk in pursuing investment recovery, based on risks such as incurring costs, being compelled to participate in discovery, and losing anonymity. Countries can be viewed as low risk (Japan), medium risk (Germany), and high risk (UK). Most European countries are medium risk.

A country’s risk level impacts an investor’s decision on whether to participate in a filing. An investor is likely to participate in any filing in a passive jurisdiction, as there is no downside. But in active jurisdictions, most investors have a “loss threshold” that must be passed before participating.

  • Overall, Europe shows signs of becoming more passive. Currently, most non-US/Canada matters outside of Europe are already passive. And, looking forward, Europe may become more passive. Support for this belief comes from Dutch Collective Settlements, from the German KapMug process, from the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal, and from the EU’s “New Deal for Consumers.” These indicators all point toward a more passive environment taking hold in Europe.

In addition to providing more data and details on each of these topics, in this webinar Lange also:

  • Provided a framework investors can use in choosing which European matters to participate in and which organizers to work with.
  • Described non-litigation means investors are using to change governance and corporate behavior.
  • Offered observations on other European trends, including multi-country recovery efforts and claim assignments.

For insights into the shifting landscape for investment recovery in Europe and around the globe, check out the webinar replay. You will gain a better understanding of what is happening related to investment recovery in Europe and what it means for you.

>> VIEW THE REPLAY HERE. <<

Learn More

For more details on non-U.S. shareholder litigation monitoring and recovery opportunities, please contact your FRT representative or email us at learnmore@frtservices.com.

About FRT

SETTLED CLAIMS  I  PASSIVE GROUP  I  ANTITRUST  I  FUTURE CLAIMS  I  OPT-IN MONITORING  I OPT-OUT MONITORING

Founded in 2008, Financial Recovery Technologies (FRT) is a leading technology-based services firm that helps the investment community identify eligibility, file claims and collect funds made available in securities and other class action settlements. Offering the most comprehensive range of claim filing and monitoring services available, we provide best-in-class eligibility analysis, disbursement auditing and client reporting, and deliver the highest level of accuracy, accountability and transparency available. For more information, go to www.frtservices.com.

This communication and the content found by following any link herein are being provided to you by Financial Recovery Technologies (FRT) for informational purposes only and does not constitute advice. All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but FRT makes no representation or warranty with respect to this communication or such content and expressly disclaims any implied warranty under law. Opinions expressed in this communication may change without prior notice. Firms should always seek legal and financial advice specific to their unique situation and objectives.

Search Tags

Our Authors

Ally GosmanAlly Gosman

Sr. Marketing Specialist

Andrew LaskyAndrew Lasky

Legal Product Specialist

Jenn RothenbergJenn Rothenberg

VP of Marketing

Mike LangeMike Lange

Securities Litigation Counsel

Latest News