Access insight and case participation assistance into Antitrust, Commodity Exchange Act and other non-securities litigations
Maximize Recovery From Antitrust Class Actions Litigations
What process do you have in place for recovery opportunities outside of the traditional U.S. passive claims filing for securities class actions?
These cases arise out of anti-competitive behavior and/or market manipulation, often involving financial instruments or traded contracts (including commodities) other than stocks and bonds. They differ from securities class actions in that the cases themselves involve different bodies of law and different processes for recovery.
Our Antitrust Recovery Service is designed to help you Identify, file claims and recover funds in non-securities class actions including those under federal antitrust laws, the Commodity Exchange Act, and other laws relevant to their business.
‘But-For’ Modeling in the Stock Lending Class Action Settlements
In an earlier piece about the upcoming claims administration for the $581M+ partial settlement of the antitrust class action involving stock lending, I suggested the significant time lag we’re seeing between preliminary approvals and the...
Previously, I wrote about the upcoming claims administration for the $581M+ partial settlement of the antitrust class action involving stock lending. Given the prevalence of share borrowing and lending by institutional investors, we expect broad...
Stock Lending Settlements: If “Interested”, Capitalize Now For Returns Later
Two partial settlements, in the Stock Lending Class Action, totaling $581M were recently preliminarily approved by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Upon final approval, these settlements will resolve claims...
FRT Insights: Global Securities Class Action Landscape – 2023 Mid-Year Review
Download our proprietary report analyzing the mid-year 2023 global recovery landscape.
By understanding historical data and the current environment, institutional investors and the legal professionals advising them can make informed predictions about the...
Case Spotlight: Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Settlement
The District Court preliminarily approved a $20.7M partial settlement of federal antitrust and common law claims against Barclays and J.P. Morgan (the “Settling Defendants”). Plaintiffs will continue litigation against the...
Antitrust Cases – Opportunity for Institutional Investors in Australia
Participation in Antitrust class actions is complicated. They require an in-depth understanding of the ubiquitous nature of interest rates, how they might impact your portfolio, and how long you’ve been investing in instruments tied to these rates. While...
On September 6, 2016, plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement with Deutsche Bank (Settlement: $38m) in a suit alleging that the bank conspired to dictate the price of silver. Since the settlement against Deutsche Bank, litigation has continued against...
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.