Australia is the second most active jurisdiction in the world for securities class actions, but millions of dollars are being left unclaimed by asset owners. Leaving money on the table shouldn’t be the outcome for investors.
For an asset owner, knowing if there are funds available to be returned from a class action can be almost impossible without dedicated resources. Cross-referencing share ownership history against ongoing shareholder class actions – that may have commenced years ago – requires operational bandwidth, and unlike corporate actions, the information required to research class action activity is splintered across many jurisdictions, organisations, and entities. In addition, firms are also challenged with being aware of potential actions. Often, the communication to notify investors of a potential shareholder action is addressed to someone who left the firm many years before.
However, that doesn’t mean that opportunities to recover funds that are available should be ignored just because the process is perceived to be complex. Ensuring all eligible funds are returned to an asset owner is part of the fiduciary duty of those entrusted with managing other people’s money.
Fiduciary duty is invoked in many ways, whether in arguments around fossil fuel investment, climate action, or whether capital should be deployed on social projects that may have a great social outcome but ultimately return a lower investment than other options. Many of those leads to complex and multi-faceted discussions around the purpose of capital, and whether investing for performance outcomes means excluding lower returning options in favour of higher-yielding investments that may be more likely to cause frustration with investors.
I think everyone would agree that availing of a mechanism to return money to investors – that they are entitled to because of corporate failure – falls easily into the expectations around fiduciary duty.
Why fiduciaries should care about class action participation
One super fund that clearly views the class action mechanism as important to their business and to member outcomes is HESTA. In 2020 alone, HESTA was involved in 21 class actions, including against Westpac, CBA, and an alleged foreign exchange cartel including UBS, Royal Bank of Scotland, JP Morgan, Citibank and Barclays and earned an average of $32 million from successful actions. (1)
Evidence at a parliamentary hearing into litigation funding showed that funds participate in class actions with two objectives in mind: to recover losses, and to increase accountability of companies which it views as a fundamental part of its role as an active investor.
Class actions are a process that enables shareholders to recoup their losses and to also spur increased governance in the company, leading to enhanced director independence, audit firm rotation, and insider trading controls.
This is key – superannuation funds and fund managers, by holding businesses to account through shareholder litigation, contribute to a more transparent financial system where the businesses themselves are less able to make vast profits whilst investors are left carrying the risk and losses.
As HESTA noted in their submission to the Parliamentary Litigation Funding and the Regulation of the Class Action Industry Inquiry; they participate in class actions “to recover losses but also as a means of encouraging better standards of corporate governance and improved accountability by companies, directors and corporate advisors to their shareholders.”
(1) R. Myer, ‘HESTA chases class action dollars, joining 21 shareholder cases’, The Daily News, https://thenewdaily.com.au/finance/superannuation/2020/08/30/class-action-hesta-westpac/, (Aug 30, 2020)
To learn more about how FRT can help your firm maximize recoveries in shareholder class action settlements, contact us at email@example.com.
- [ Blog ] Five Tips for More Profitable Engagements in Non-US Opt-In Opportunities
- [ Blog ] Five Reasons Investors Need a Non-US Opt-In Service
- [ Webinar ] FRT Insights: Understanding What it Means to be a Fiduciary – Insights from Former SEC Assistant Director
- [ Blog ] FRT Insights Webinar Recap – Part 1: Dialogue with Conway Dodge, former Assistant Director in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement
- [ Blog ] FRT Insights Webinar Recap – Part 2: Dialogue with Conway Dodge, former Assistant Director in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement
- [ Webinar ] FRT Insights: A Dialogue with Jeremy Hill, Group General Counsel, Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd.
SETTLED CLAIMS I PASSIVE GROUP I ANTITRUST I CLAIMS MONETIZATION I OPT-IN MONITORING I OPT-OUT MONITORING
Founded in 2008, Financial Recovery Technologies (FRT) is the leading technology-based services firm that helps the investment community identify eligibility, file claims and collect funds made available in securities and other class action settlements. Offering the most comprehensive range of claim filing and monitoring services available, we provide best-in-class eligibility analysis, disbursement auditing and client reporting, and deliver the highest level of accuracy, accountability and transparency available. For more information, go to www.frtservices.com.
This communication and the content found by following any link herein are being provided to you by Financial Recovery Technologies (FRT) for informational purposes only and does not constitute advice. All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but FRT makes no representation or warranty with respect to this communication or such content and expressly disclaims any implied warranty under law. Opinions expressed in this communication may change without prior notice. Firms should always seek legal and financial advice specific to their unique situation and objectives.