Drop in securities class actions filings should not raise alarm

FRT Admin
Site administrator
February 5, 2013

Industry reviews like the one conducted by Cornerstone Research have proven that the 152 securities class action cases that were filed in 2012 failed by 20% to reach the annual average from 1997-2012. Should there be concern that this decline will continue, or was last year an anomaly, and class actions will likely bump up in the near future to their historical levels? The answer according to most experts is that the securities class action industry is cyclical, oftentimes reflecting the economic and regulatory atmosphere and trends from several years ago, as well as the focus of plaintiffs’ attorneys. The decrease in 2012 filings resulted primarily from a significant decline in merger & acquisition cases, actions taken against Chinese-based organizations, and the waning of credit-crisis related lawsuits.

An article by Lane Powell emphasizes that securities class action litigation will not be disappearing any time soon. The reason being that plaintiffs’ law firms have specialized in class actions, utilizing a great deal of resources building relationships with institutional investors and systematizing the process of choosing which companies to go after and which cases to pursue. As long as companies continue to have stock declines and publish misinformation, law firms will continue to devote resources to filing litigation.

The securities class action world exists in a constantly fluctuating environment. Regulations are imposed and updated, new economic trends emerge, and plaintiffs’ attorneys evolve along with the changes. When the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 was passed containing provisions expected to protect companies from class action litigation, lawyers developed new tactics, including filing at the state level and courting the largest institutional investors to serve as lead plaintiffs.

Examples of plaintiff attorneys adjusting to the changing economy include the boom in cases resulting from the credit crisis and IPO laddering cases, which included more than 300 issuers and underwriters. Of course, law firms also continue to file many “usual” cases when large stock declines occur. Some years see more filings and some years see less, which harks back to the point the securities class actions are often cyclical in nature.

While the number of cases that were filed and settled was lower in 2012, instances of dismissed cases were much lower than average. The decrease in settlements indicates a longer case resolution time. With fewer cases being dismissed and longer periods before settlements, it seems that 2013 could see an increase in settlements as compared to 2012. It is important to be prepared to respond to the class action environment, regardless of the current trends.

ABOUT FINANCIAL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES
SETTLED  I  NON-US GLOBAL OPT-IN  I  ANTITRUST  I  GLOBAL PASSIVE  I  DIRECT OPT-OUT  I  BUYOUTS

Founded in 2008, Financial Recovery Technologies (FRT) is a leading technology-based services firm that helps the investment community identify eligibility, file claims and collect funds made available in securities and other class action settlements. Offering the most comprehensive range of claim filing and monitoring services available, we provide best-in-class eligibility analysis, disbursement auditing and client reporting, and deliver the highest level of accuracy, accountability and transparency available. For more information, go to www.frtservices.com.

 

This communication and the content found by following any link herein are being provided to you by Financial Recovery Technologies (FRT) for informational purposes only and does not constitute advice. All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but FRT makes no representation or warranty with respect to this communication or such content and expressly disclaims any implied warranty under law. Opinions expressed in this communication may change without prior notice. Firms should always seek legal and financial advice specific to their unique situation and objectives.